Saturday, August 28, 2010

Poll: Is offering a "no kids" section a good idea for airlines?

This morning, I watched an interesting report on to family seating in airplanes. Here is an excerpt from a related article on the web:
Of the 2,000 respondents in the unscientific poll, 70 percent want to sit "as far away as possible from children." And about a quarter of non-parent respondents went one step further saying that they would prefer flights that are free of children.Of parents, 45 percent say they don't want to see a families-only section on planes because they don't want to sit next to "other people's horrors," the website says.

"As a relative new mum myself I can still remember that feeling of dread when you found yourself seated next to a baby on a long flight," says Skyscanner's spokeswoman Mary Porter. "However since regularly flying with my one-year-old, I am much more aware of what a stressful and often embarrassing situation it can be for parents."

She opines if passengers are willing to pay extra for child-free flying, "perhaps the solution is a premium adults-only section, rather than a pre-allocated families section."
Charging different prices to different segments of a market is price discrimination, a potentially profitable strategy (which I have written about before). Even though it can be a profitable strategy, it is not always profitable -- especially if charging different prices to customers puts people off.

With a hot topic issue, this means that there is a tradeoff from extracting extra revenue from premium seating, and offending families (which would potentially push that segment to other airlines). That brings me to the poll question of the week:

Is offering a separate "no kids" premium section of seating on the airplane a good idea?

(a) No. It would cost too much.
(b) No. It would offend families, and reduce revenues.
(c) Yes. It allows price discrimination.

The poll is open for a week, so vote early and often. Get your friends (and families) to vote as well. I'm interested in hearing what you have to say.

1 comment:

  1. Results:

    No. Too costly: 6
    No. Too offensive: 5
    Yes: 9

    ReplyDelete

Please feel free to share your ideas about this post in the open forum. Be mindful that comments in this blog are moderated. Please keep your comments respectful and on point.